Albert Venn Dicey has received a bad press recently. Anthony King has called him one of the ‘canonical sextet’ of writers on the constitution but he now mainly represents that ‘primordial Unionism’ — according to McLean and McMillan in State of the Union (2005) — founded on the sovereignty of Westminster and out of fashion in devolutionary times.
Moreover, Dicey’s constitutional arguments are too easily dismissed as Anglo-centric. However, Eng…
Subscribe now and get immediate access to the rest of this article and all the other premium content on thepolitician.org. To begin, please fill in the simple form below:
N.B. If you were a subscriber before December 2006, you should be able to login with your username and password from the old website. If you have any problems with this, please contact us.